Observational Study on How the Frequency of Dialyzer Reuse Impacts Hemodialysis Effectiveness
Abstract
Background: The increasing practice of dialyzer reuse in hemodialysis raises critical concerns regarding its impact on efficacy, infection risks, and essential metrics such as Urea Reduction Ratio (URR) and Kt/V values. Addressing these concerns is paramount to establishing safe and optimal reuse limits through comprehensive performance assessments.
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of dialyzer reuse by assessing Kt/V and URR measurements.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at RSUD Dr. Saiful Anwar's Hemodialysis Unit from November 2021 to January 2022. Data collection employed a standardized pilot form designed to collate Kt/V and URR data from all participants. Statistical analyses included repeated measures ANOVA to detect temporal changes in average Kt/V and URR, alongside Spearman correlation analysis to explore variable relationships.
Results: The study encompassed 15 participants, revealing a statistically significant decline in both Kt/V and URR values across each reuse group (p < 0.05). Specifically, each subsequent reuse of the dialyzer corresponded to a decrement of 0.0469 units in Kt/V and 1.003 units in URR. Notably, by the 7th reuse, hemodialysis adequacy remained satisfactory, achieving an average Kt/V of 1.61. Furthermore, the study indicated that even up to 11 reuses could achieve a Kt/V > 1.4. Similarly, the average URR value for the 7th reuse was 70.207%, with the potential to maintain URR > 65% even after up to 13 reuses.
Conclusion: This study unequivocally affirms that hemodialysis adequacy remains satisfactory up to the 7th reuse of dialyzers, despite observed declines in Kt/V and URR values over successive reuses.
Downloads
References
Santos-Araújo C, Mendonça L, Carvalho DS, Bernardo F, Pardal M, Couceiro J, et al. Twenty years of real-world data to estimate chronic kidney disease prevalence and staging in an unselected population. Clin Kidney J. 2023 Jan 24;16(1):111–24. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfac206
Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020 Feb;395(10225):709–33. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30045-3
Ibrahim F, Hamzah L, Jones R, Nitsch D, Sabin C, Post FA. Baseline kidney function as predictor of mortality and kidney disease progression in HIV-positive patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Oct;60(4):539–47. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.03.006
Torreggiani M, Piccoli GB, Moio MR, Conte F, Magagnoli L, Ciceri P, et al. Choice of the dialysis modality: practical considerations. J Clin Med. 2023 May 7;12(9):3328. doi:10.3390/jcm12093328
Himmelfarb J, Vanholder R, Mehrotra R, Tonelli M. The current and future landscape of dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Oct 30;16(10):573–85. doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0315-4
A, Sosa MA, Jaber BL. Single-use versus reusable dialyzers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Sep;2(5):1079–86. doi:10.2215/cjn.01040207
Ningtiyas RAK. The impact of reuse dialyzer application on routine hemodialysis patients adequacy and its correlation with cost efficiency in type D hospital. Acad Hosp J. 2023 Feb 1;3(2):1. doi:10.22146/ahj.v3i2.66612
Edens C, Wong J, Lyman M, Rizzo K, Nguyen D, Blain M, et al. Hemodialyzer reuse and gram-negative bloodstream infections. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jun;69(6):726–33. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.022
Abe M, Masakane I, Wada A, Nakai S, Nitta K, Nakamoto H. Dialyzer classification and mortality in hemodialysis patients: A 3-year nationwide cohort study. Front Med. 2021 Aug 27;8:740461. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.740461
PERNEFRI. Konsensus dialisis. Jakarta: PERNEFRI; 2011.
Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(Suppl 1):S31–4. doi:10.4103/sja.sja_543_18
Lv JC, Zhang LX. Prevalence and disease burden of chronic kidney disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1165:3–15. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8871-2_1
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Apr 15;35(2):121–6. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.116232
Ribeiro IC, Roza NAV, Duarte DA, Guadagnini D, Elias RM, Oliveira RB de. Clinical and microbiological effects of dialyzers reuse in hemodialysis patients. J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Sep;41(3):384–92. doi:10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0151
Lacson E, Wang W, Mooney A, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM, Hakim RM. Abandoning peracetic acid-based dialyzer reuse is associated with improved survival. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Feb;6(2):297–302. doi:10.2215/cjn.03160410
Sahutoglu T, Kara E, Ahbap E, Sakaci T, Koc Y, Basturk T, et al. Test of the recommended dialysis dose on one-year mortality of nondiabetic maintenance hemodialysis patients; observations from a single dialysis unit. Ren Fail Fail. 2016 Sep 13;38(8):1174–9. doi:10.1080/0886022x.2016.1208515
Chen YK, Chu CS, Niu SW, Lin HYH, Yu PH, Shen FC, et al. The prognostic value of URR equals that of Kt/V for all-cause mortality in Taiwan after 10-year follow-up. Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 1;13(1):8923. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35353-8
Tattersall J, Martin-Malo A, Pedrini L, Basci A, Canaud B, Fouque D, et al. EBPG guideline on dialysis strategies. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2007 May 1;22(Suppl 2):ii5–21. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm022
Macías-Núñez JF, Deira J, Suarez MA, Piquero L, Musso CG. What does an adequate dialysis dose in the elderly mean? usefulness of Kt/V, functional status and incremental dialysis in elderly patients. Int J Ren Dis Ther. 2018 Jan 19;1(1):1–3. doi:10.31021/ijrdt.20181101
Hamid A, Dhrolia M, Imtiaz S, Qureshi R, Ahmad A. Comparison of adequacy of dialysis between single-use and reused hemodialyzers in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Aug 1;29(8):720–3. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2019.08.720
Sunanda V, Santosh B, Jusmita D, Rao BP. Achieving the urea reduction ratio (URR) as a predictor of the adequacy and the NKF-K/DOQI target for calcium, phosphorus and Ca× P product in esrd patients who undergo haemodialysis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(2):169–72. doi:10.7860/jcdr/2012/.2009
Ahemd A, Azat NFA, Ali S. Assessment of dialysis adequacy using urea reduction ratio and kt/v in four pediatric hemodialysis centers in Baghdad. Iraqi Postgrad Med J. 2015;14(4):522–529.
Chen YA, Ou SM, Lin CC. Influence of dialysis membranes on clinical outcomes: from history to innovation. Membranes (Basel). 2022 Jan 26;12(2):152. doi:10.3390/membranes12020152
Goodyear MDE, Krleza-Jeric K, Lemmens T. The declaration of Helsinki. BMJ. 2007 Sep 29;335(7621):624–5. doi:10.1136/bmj.39339.610000.be
Copyright (c) 2024 Indonesian Journal of Kidney and Hypertension

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Indonesian Journal of Kidney and Hypertension agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Indonesian Journal of Kidney and Hypertension right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License that allows others to remix, adapt, build upon the work non-commercially with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in Indonesian Journal of Kidney and Hypertension.
- Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work non-commercially (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Indonesian Journal of Kidney and Hypertension.